IMAGINARY LANDSCAPE NO. 2 (1940)
David Patterson <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Oct 2018 18:05:27 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.john-cage |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
------=_Part_410858_2011300522.1539885927368 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all. I'm looking for some specific information about Cage's "Imaginary Landscape= No. 2"--NOTE: the first one from 1940 that he withdrew, and NOT the one fr= om 1942 (which only makes things harder, of course). Specifically:We know that the "Imaginary Landscape No. 1" uses the followin= g system of rhythmic organization--15 measures + 1-measure coda15 measures = + 2-measure coda15 measures + 3-measure coda15 measures + 4-measure coda Along those same lines, what is the system of organization for the original= "Imaginary Landscape No. 2?" I'm guessing it's not a micro-macrocosmic str= ucture but would at least reflect the same kind of rigor as "Imaginary Land= scape No. 1." But I'd rather not guess, of course! The score is unpublished and at the New York Public Library--which helps me= not at all here in Chicago. Any informed insights welcome! And if you have= a citation to go with it, double-gracias!=C2=A0 :) --David P. ------=_Part_410858_2011300522.1539885927368 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html><head></head><body><div>Hi all.</div><div><br></div><div>I'm looking = for some specific information about Cage's "Imaginary Landscape No. 2"--NOT= E: the first one from 1940 that he withdrew, and NOT the one from 1942 (whi= ch only makes things harder, of course).</div><div><br></div><div>Specifica= lly:</div><div>We know that the "Imaginary Landscape No. 1" uses the follow= ing system of rhythmic organization--</div><div>15 measures + 1-measure cod= a</div><div>15 measures + 2-measure coda</div><div>15 measures + 3-measure = coda</div><div>15 measures + 4-measure coda</div><div><br></div><div>Along = those same lines, what is the system of organization for the original "Imag= inary Landscape No. 2?" I'm guessing it's not a micro-macrocosmic structure= but would at least reflect the same kind of rigor as "Imaginary Landscape = No. 1." But I'd rather not guess, of course!</div><div><br></div><div>The s= core is unpublished and at the New York Public Library--which helps me not = at all here in Chicago. Any informed insights welcome! And if you have a ci= tation to go with it, double-gracias! :)</div><div><br></div><div>--D= avid P.</div><div class=3D"ydp13890f15yahoo-style-wrap" style=3D"font-famil= y: Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"></div></= body></html> ------=_Part_410858_2011300522.1539885927368--