Re: ra as a long running task
Carter Bullard via Argus-info <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.argus |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hey Brad, Try the latest in the development section. May be s fix already in the codebase. http://qosient.com/argus/dev/argus-clients-latest.tar.gz Carter > On May 4, 2016, at 2:01 PM, Brad <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 05/04/2016 10:05 AM, Carter Bullard wrote: >> Hey Brad, >> Shouldn’t be any memory leaks. What version are you running ??? >> >> If you want to permanently collect from argus, definitely use radium as >> that provides multi-access to the argus stream. It also allows you to >> collect from multiple sources, so I would suggest that you think about >> radium. >> >> Carter >> >>> On May 4, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Brad via Argus-info >>> <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Is ra meant to be used for long running tasks? >>> >>> When I run it to read from a socket (see below) for an extended >>> period (a few days) memory usage slowly grows to 100% and the process >>> dies. >>> >>> ra -c, -L-1 -nn -p 3 -Zs -s stime ltime dur saddr daddr sport dport >>> state proto spkts sbytes dbytes -S argus_sensor:5050 >>> >>> If ra should work acceptably in this situation, I can debug more and >>> find the cause of the memory leak. If it is not meant for this >>> purpose, what should I use instead of ra. radium? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Brad > > Hey Carter, > > /usr/local/bin/ra --version > Ra Version 3.0.8 > > Brad >