Re: wrong source ip addr on aggregation
Carter Bullard <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Jun 2018 09:04:46 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.argus |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hey Frank, Can you send a data file that replicates the problem ??? It does seem to be a bug. Argus aggreagation of IP addresses uses a ‘longest prefix match’ algorithm, and printing them as cidr addresses should show what bits are left over. That is an option in the .rarc file. Carter > On Jun 28, 2018, at 8:41 AM, Frank <[email protected]> wrote: > > hi, > > i encountered the following issue, resulting in a wrong source ipv6 address: > > there are several connections to the same ipv6 address, coming from two > different source addresses, which however share the same /48 bits: > > 11:57:23.766559 e tcp 1111:22:3333:4444::15.21978 -> > caffe:affe::1.https 48 16800 FIN > 12:03:26.631506 e tcp 1111:22:3333:4444::15.52620 -> > caffe:affe::1.smtp 47 22007 FIN > 12:03:26.631451 e tcp 1111:22:3333:4444::15.52620 -> > caffe:affe::1.smtp 47 22007 FIN > 12:05:08.037777 e tcp 1111:22:3333:4444::15.51150 -> > caffe:affe::1.http 11 1844 FIN > 12:05:08.041924 e ipv6-icmp 1111:22:3333:4444::15.0x0080 <-> > caffe:affe::1.0x0000 2 178 ECO > 12:05:08.037777 e tcp 1111:22:3333:5555::15.51150 -> > caffe:affe::1.http 11 1844 FIN > > now, with racluster, i get this: > > racluster -r /tmp/ipv6traffic -m daddr > 08:01:18.051607 e ip 1111:22:1111:22:: <-> > caffe:affe::1 12119 5900614 CON > > with a wrong source net. > > > there is only one icmp connection in /tmp/ipv6traffic (shown above), and > when i strip it, suddenly the output changes to this: > > racluster -r /tmp/ipv6traffic_stripped -m daddr > 08:01:18.051607 e * tcp 1111:22:: -> > caffe:affe::1 12117 5900436 FIN > > with a (more) correct stripped source address. > > > btw. is there a way to influence the "ip-stripping" process on > aggregation? e.g. in the last case, i would have expected this source > address: 1111:22:3333:: > > and/or is it possible to somehow indicate on output, if and how many > bits of the source (or destination) address have been stripped? > > thanks > frank > >