Re: packaging beepcore-c

"William J. Mills" wrote:
> 
> On the topic of combining the libraries, if I remember the build structure
> right it might be possible to achieve this easily by simply building .a
> instead of .so in everywhere but the wrapper.

If you are talking about taking a several .a files and building
one .so, great idea. Be sure to still build the .o's in the .a's
with PIC or you may have a bogus un-sharable, but still loadable .so
file on some OS's.

> If that works it would be really minor and nothing else need change except
> the installation stuff.
> 
> -bill
> 
> >
> > If I were designing it, I'd flatten the include structure and coalesce
> > the libraries -- perhaps even to just one library.  If there's some
> > consensus that this is a good idea, then I'd prefer to delay uploading
> > the packages until the changes are made, to avoid forcing users to
> > make a major transition.

begin:vcard 
n:Royer;Doug
tel;pager:[email protected]
tel;cell:208-520-4044
tel;fax:866-594-8574
tel;work:866-594-8574
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://Royer.com/People/Doug
org:http://INET-Consulting.com
adr:;;1795 W. Broadway #266;Idaho Falls;Idaho;83402;U.S.A.
version:2.1
email;internet:[email protected]
title:Chief Executive Manager
x-mozilla-cpt:;12704
fn:Doug Royer
end:vcard