Which comes first, pro_start_confirmation or pro_start_callback?
David C Niemi <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Oct 2003 17:24:46 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.beep.beepcore.c.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I was noticing that pro_start_confirmation() and pro_start_callback() sound mighty similar. It sounds like the pro_start_confirmation() may be slightly later, but if so I'm curious what the distinction is between the two. In other words, once a response is received to a request to start a channel, what remains to be done before the channel is actually considered to have started? Is there some local housekeeping first that may take significant time, or what? In a vaguely related question, is there a clean and convenient way to pass a short text string from the channel initiator to the peer for the remote profile to utilize when it is asked to start a channel? Or it is expected that any such profile-specific dealings should wait until after the channel has already started? ------------------------------------------------------- -- David C. Niemi Adeptech Systems, Inc. -- -- Reston, Virginia, USA http://www.adeptech.com/ -- ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf