Re: RPM Packaging for Beepcore-C?

I'll check them in.  I wanted something more than my own testing before I did.

Agreed on the latency changes.

I also think a tuning setting on a channel for minimum fragment size
might be easily implemented.  That would give you what you were looking for
a while ago of setting that to >4k whih means your frames would always
g whole.

Regards,

-bill

On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 04:36:46PM -0400, David C Niemi wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, William J. Mills wrote:
> > I am rpretty sure the answe is no.  Go for it!
> > 
> > How did the silly window changes work out?
> 
> They worked, and I'd like to see some form of them go into the main tree.  
> The latency changes need to be generalized.  I'd like to put together a 
> patch with all my changes for your review -- probably next week.
> 
> DCN
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> -- David C. Niemi           Adeptech Systems, Inc.   --
> -- Reston, Virginia, USA    http://www.adeptech.com/ --
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Beepcore-c-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/beepcore-c-users


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click