Re: RPM Packaging for Beepcore-C?

I still need to check in the silly window fixes, but then yes
a tarball is a very reasonable thing.

-bill

On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 12:26:09PM -0400, David C Niemi wrote:
> 
> The first thing I'm discovering is that the diff from 0.2.00 to the
> current CVS version is HUGE, and it is messy due to such things as the
> "core" directory tree being renamed to "base".  It would be a great help
> to have a new baseline version like 0.2.10, even if it is just a snapshot
> of CVS, so I have something to work with that other people could reliably 
> reproduce.
> 
> Is there any possibility of making a CVS snapshot available as a tarball
> in the near future?  Or if I make one, could it be available on
> SourceForge so that I can refer to it in the RPM spec file?
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> -- David C. Niemi           Adeptech Systems, Inc.   --
> -- Reston, Virginia, USA    http://www.adeptech.com/ --
> -------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35
or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th!
http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297