Re: core subdirectories
"William J. Mills" <[email protected]> Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:30:34 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.beep.beepcore.c.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
My question is which of these do the exect to be a directory? WHy the heck do they have the -rf rather than just -f? trap 'rm -fr conftest* confdefs* core core.* *.core $ac_clean_files; exit 1' 1 2 15 This seems overly aggressive. -bill On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:46:03PM -0700, Matt Small wrote: > Hmm. I think this is a version difference; the original configure script was > generated with autoconf 2.13, and I've generated mine with 2.53. Unfortunately, > the new version always executes the cleanup code, on exits from all signals. > > Sorry that I didn't see the version difference, though; I didn't even think of > looking for that. > > -matt > > > This looks like a real problem, but only if the configure script is > > interrupted. The problem lines are of the form > > > > trap 'rm -fr conftest* confdefs* core core.* *.core $ac_clean_files; exit 1' 1 2 15 > > > > and they appear throughout the script. These lines appear to be > > generated automatically by autoconf. > > > > It hasn't been my experience that running configure causes the core > > directory to be deleted. (That would be really awful!) But from > > looking at the code, just typing C-c at the wrong time during its > > execution would cause core to be deleted. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31