Re: message handling

It should be valid to have multiple MSG frames pening waiting for 
RPY, and they can be delivered to the peer.

It's not defined whether an implementation must send all frames 
pending outbound if the window is not full, but it is the preferred
behavior :)

I don't know the java implementation, if thats the bug you are fixing, 
I'd say it is valid.

-bill

> Yes, I found this in the rfc. But, does this mean that it can be send
> but will remain in queue untill the previous message is sent or does
> this mean that it is illegal to send a message untill the previous has
> had a valid reply?
> 
> And should a BEEP implemetation prevent the second massage being sent?
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click