Re: Success with rr...

Andrea Campi <[email protected]> Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:14:25 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.network.beep.roadrunner.general
Organization	I.NET S.p.A.
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 09:43:06AM -0400, Riggio, Michael wrote:
> Hi,
>       Curious to know if anyone has had success using rr.  I'm trying to
> decide between beepcore-c and rr and it appears that rr is a lot more
> intuitive to use from a programmers prospective.  Are there any
> stability/reliability issues with rr (or any other issues)?  

We're basing a new product of us on rr. I tried using beepcore-c,
and besides anything I can say from a developer point of view
(rr API is way better), beepcore is simply so much slower to make
it unusable in production. As usual, YMMV.

Bye,
	Andrea

-- 
Andrea Campi                              mailto:[email protected]
I.NET S.p.A. - BT Ignite                  http://www.inet.it
Technical Dept. - R&D			  phone: +39 02 32863 ext 1
v. Darwin, 85 - I-20019			  fax: +39 02 32863 ext 7705
Settimo Milanese (MI), Italy