Re: Introduction, XML-RPC Profile
Marshall Rose <[email protected]> Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:26:26 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.beep.roadrunner.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Dover Beach Consulting, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > Hello, > > Before I get too far along, let me introduce myself. I am a developer > for a company called "Bluefin Robotics" > (http://www.bluefinrobotics.com/) in the US. Yes, we really make > submarines. cool. > I'm very interested in using BEEP as the core framework for a suite of > (commercial) operator tools. I'm impressed with the usability > of the existing Roadrunner toolkit. Aside from the obvious licensing > issues, how 'healthy' is the BEEP developer community? Are these many > other commercial or Open Source projects using BEEP? i think that the roadrunner implementation is currently the best 'c' language implementation of beep. there are lists of other beep projects, etc., at http://beepcore.org/ > I'm particularly interested in using the XML-RPC profile for my > application. Over the last couple of days I've developed a > HTTP->BEEP proxy/gateway application and have started to test the > RR-XMLRPC implementation against the Frontier XML-RPC validation suite > (validator.xmlrpc.com). Finally, this morning, I passed the > validation suite! yeah, doing xmlrpc over beep is pretty cool > Completion of the validation suite required a series of patches to the > xml-rpc module (the xml-rpc serialization/unserialization syntax was > internally consistent, but not consistent to other implementations). > I've also produced a "validation test server" which will complete the > tests. I recognize there are some commercial aspects which may need > to be ironed out, but I'd like to start a dialog about integrating my > patches into the Roadrunner distribution. good luck! /mtr