Re: Bittorrent in a gaming cafe

"uptime_steve" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.bit-torrent.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>

--- In [email protected], Justin Cormack <justin@s...> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I work in a gaming cafe and am currently working on a project to use
> > > bittorrent as an effective means of copying games from our server to
> > > our client computers.  However, I ran in to a few problems with some
> > > of the larger games.
> > >
> > > Firstly, using 3.4.2 seemed somewhat better than 3.9.0 in terms of
> > > speed.  no biggy, i'll just use 3.4.2.
> > >
> > > Secondly, it seems the download rate of the files diminish quite
> > > rapidly.  we're using a 100mbit network, and get transfer speeds
> > > (using normal windows copy) of about 7meg / sec.  using
bittorrent to
> > > copy a file (just 1 seed and no other peers) started off at a
healthy
> > > 7meg a second, but as the file went on, the speed slowly went
down and
> > > down.  w hat took 7 minutes using windows copy ultimately took
half an
> > > hour using bittorrent.  it scaled well though, obviously, taking
about
> > > 35mins to 5 machines at once.  this is for a file a little over
1gb in
> > > size.  i'm not sure whether this is it being choked, or some other
> > > reason why.  is there a way i can 'hack the source' to completely
> > > disable choking? it's being used in a controlled environment, so
> > > tit-for-tat sharing isn't an issue - getting it out as quickly as
> > > possible is.
> > >
> > > Thirdly, i was getting major troubles when trying to copy games that
> > > had a huge number of files (steam has over 1000 files in it). 
i'd get
> > > an error that too many files were open.  with linux it could be
fixed
> > > by using the command 'ulimit',  but it seems windows has no such
> > > option.  any advice with this one?  I hear azerus gets around this
> > > issue, but I really need the command line interface over the GUI,
> > > since a lot of this is done remotely using rsh.
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > XBT Client supports up to about 2000 open file handles, but this
is global, 
> > not-torrent. So you could only download a single torrent at a time.
> > Would that be an option?
> > It also has a simple command line interface and web interface.
> > 
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/xbtt/ 
> > 
> 
> You may be better off putting all the files into a zip file/loopback
image,
> and then getting the client to read these after. I wouldnt be
surprised if the
> number of files was slowing you down too, as lots of small files
mean extra
> work for the clients as they have to split blocks that arrive or are
sent
> between files.

oh, that XBT sounds good actually.  the limit of one torrent at a time
isn't a problem at all - i can't think of anything off the top of my
head why we would need more than one at a time.  i'll check it out
tomorrow (it's kinda late at night at the moment).

the zip file idea sounds alright in theory, but it also means i have
to wait an additional large amount of time unzipping the thing,
especially if there's a large amount of files.

any ideas on the diminishing transfer rate? it starts off at 6mb/sec
but ends up going down to 1.5mb/s or less as time wears on, for large
files (>1gb)

thanks again :)





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
$4.98 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Q7_YsB/neXJAA/yQLSAA/dkFolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BitTorrent/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.