Re: Bittorrent in a gaming cafe
"uptime_steve" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.bit-torrent.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- In [email protected], Justin Cormack <justin@s...> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I work in a gaming cafe and am currently working on a project to use > > > bittorrent as an effective means of copying games from our server to > > > our client computers. However, I ran in to a few problems with some > > > of the larger games. > > > > > > Firstly, using 3.4.2 seemed somewhat better than 3.9.0 in terms of > > > speed. no biggy, i'll just use 3.4.2. > > > > > > Secondly, it seems the download rate of the files diminish quite > > > rapidly. we're using a 100mbit network, and get transfer speeds > > > (using normal windows copy) of about 7meg / sec. using bittorrent to > > > copy a file (just 1 seed and no other peers) started off at a healthy > > > 7meg a second, but as the file went on, the speed slowly went down and > > > down. w hat took 7 minutes using windows copy ultimately took half an > > > hour using bittorrent. it scaled well though, obviously, taking about > > > 35mins to 5 machines at once. this is for a file a little over 1gb in > > > size. i'm not sure whether this is it being choked, or some other > > > reason why. is there a way i can 'hack the source' to completely > > > disable choking? it's being used in a controlled environment, so > > > tit-for-tat sharing isn't an issue - getting it out as quickly as > > > possible is. > > > > > > Thirdly, i was getting major troubles when trying to copy games that > > > had a huge number of files (steam has over 1000 files in it). i'd get > > > an error that too many files were open. with linux it could be fixed > > > by using the command 'ulimit', but it seems windows has no such > > > option. any advice with this one? I hear azerus gets around this > > > issue, but I really need the command line interface over the GUI, > > > since a lot of this is done remotely using rsh. > > > > Hi, > > > > XBT Client supports up to about 2000 open file handles, but this is global, > > not-torrent. So you could only download a single torrent at a time. > > Would that be an option? > > It also has a simple command line interface and web interface. > > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/xbtt/ > > > > You may be better off putting all the files into a zip file/loopback image, > and then getting the client to read these after. I wouldnt be surprised if the > number of files was slowing you down too, as lots of small files mean extra > work for the clients as they have to split blocks that arrive or are sent > between files. oh, that XBT sounds good actually. the limit of one torrent at a time isn't a problem at all - i can't think of anything off the top of my head why we would need more than one at a time. i'll check it out tomorrow (it's kinda late at night at the moment). the zip file idea sounds alright in theory, but it also means i have to wait an additional large amount of time unzipping the thing, especially if there's a large amount of files. any ideas on the diminishing transfer rate? it starts off at 6mb/sec but ends up going down to 1.5mb/s or less as time wears on, for large files (>1gb) thanks again :) ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> $4.98 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything. http://us.click.yahoo.com/Q7_YsB/neXJAA/yQLSAA/dkFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BitTorrent/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/