Re: Tracker scrape extension proposal
Nick Johnson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.bit-torrent.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Harold Feit - Depthstrike.com Administrator wrote:
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Taking a look at the way get values are generated in cases of
>multiple paramaters of the same key typically overwrites the value in
>default configurations, preventing other values from being available.
>Other configurations only read the first value, not allowing access
>to those after it.
>
>Clients that don't support asking for multiple scrapes in the same
>request will only request 1 at a time, consistent with the way they
>have done in the past.
>
>For tracker-side development, I feel your suggestion of returning all
>torrents when processing multiple info_hash values isn't supported is
>quite damaging to the tracker (pointing back to your "thousands of
>torrents" tracker example). If you requested the scrape data for 5
>torrents and got 5000, you would be doing more damage to the tracker
>than getting 5 separate requests.
>
>
Then perhaps two mechanisms is better. At the moment, I'm requesting the
full scrape for each tracker, because individual requests are usually
inefficient. If I could specify a list of desired keys and have it give
me them or everything, this would be an improvement in efficiency. The
one that only wants 5 (but really, how often will that happen in
reality?) can use the current mechanism.
As it stands, if I try and use the current system to request more than
one hash, I'm quite likely to get a response with only one, wasting a
request.
-Nick Johnson
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BitTorrent/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/