Re: Tracker scrape extension proposal

"dropnessence" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.bit-torrent.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>


Keep-alive is a bad system to use with a bittorrent tracker. By
default clients are set to only hit the server every 5 mins. If you
keep a thread/socket alive for 5 minutes just for that client, and you
have a swarm of clients then you will be keeping thousands of
threads/sockets open for keep-alive. Keep-alive is useful for webpage
where somebody is clicking on something every 3-60 seconds. BT happens
every 300 seconds. If the BT tracker (announce) is implemented by a
web-server (eg, PHP), then keep-alive should be disabled.

--- In [email protected], "Roger Pate" <roger@q...> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:19:42 +0100, Olaf van der Spek <OvdSpek@L...>
wrote:
> 
> >> from the tracker, individual requests aren't particularaly efficient,
> >> but nor is fetching everything. I'd still rather fetch everything
than
> >> hit the tracker with 100 HTTP requests, though. This is why I
think it'd
> >
> > Why?
> > 100 single-torrent requests consume far less than 3 mb.
> 
> Each HTTP request consumes server resources, even if the data
transferred is small. One hundred requests is significant.
> 
> How trackers support keep-alive? That would help, but not eliminate,
this problem.





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BitTorrent/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.