Re: An alternative "super-seed" mode
Jesus Cea <[email protected]> Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:03:25 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.bit-torrent.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Argo Redes y Servicios Telematicos, S.A. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Nick Johnson wrote: > So you're favoring peers that are parsimonious and don't contribute much > to the swarm? Given this strategy, the best strategy for a peer in a > super-seeder-heavy torrent would be to upload nothing, and hence get > priority from all the peers over those that are actually uploading > something. Good point, but invalid. I suggest priorizing peers receiving less pieces from other peers, not the ones sending less to other. By definition, if a peer is receiving less pieces that other, is because, it is sending faster to the other. Think about a seeder and two peers swarm. I think you missunderstand my proposal :) -- Jesus Cea Avion _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ [email protected] http://www.argo.es/~jcea/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ PGP Key Available at KeyServ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BitTorrent/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/