Re: Back to Merkle Hash Trees...
Olaf van der Spek <[email protected]> Mon, 07 Feb 2005 10:34:07 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.bit-torrent.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Elliott Mitchell wrote: >>From: Brian Dessent <[email protected]> >>Elliott Mitchell wrote: >> >>>It is more than strong enough to fulfill its intended purpose. Mainly >>>guarding against errors due to line noise and other accidental errors >>>during packet handling. >> >>Yes, in a perfect world. But there are unfortunately lots and lots of >>broken routers and TCP stacks out there. >>http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/stone00when.html > > > True, but that is irrelevant as long as the end points verify them. There Them? What's them? IIRC that article is about packets with a valid ethernet CRC and a valid TCP checksum, but data that's not the same as what the original sender send. > isn't any point in worrying about this condition, because if this fails > we're already dead. > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BitTorrent/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/