Re: Standards (was Back to Merkle Hash Trees...)
Justin Cormack <[email protected]> Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:03:48 +0000 (GMT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.bit-torrent.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>
>
>
> > > But if you cant transfer less than 32k, there is no point having the
> > > segment size less than 32k. As far as I can see.
> >
> > The (only) point is to make the root hash (and top of the tree)
> > independent of the chunk/piece size and to maintain compatibility with
> > other uses of merkle hashes/THEX.
>
> Does compatibility with THEX have value? If not, there's a reasonable
> argument that the lowest level leaves in the Merkle hash tree should be
> 32K bytes in size. What is the value of THEX compatibility?
I am not sure 32k is a good idea, but can anyone summarise who Onion networks
are, whether any other people are using or thinking of using THEX, or
whether anyone else is using non-THEX compatible Merkle?
j
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BitTorrent/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/