Re: IPv6 and compact tracker response

On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:57:36 -0000, Paulo S Silva Jr <[email protected]> wrote:

> So if we create an "peers_ipv6" only in conjunction with a "compact"
> request that would have all the IPv6 peers addresses in the same way
> we use "peers" in IPv4.

That was proposed and I guess everyone agreed, yes.

> Further more, we could use the same "peers_ipv6" as the same RPF
> 2553 states how an IPv4 address sould be represented as an IPv6
> address.

Sounds practicable.

> The IPv4 10.10.10.5 in this sintax is represented with the prefix
> 0:0:0:0:0:FFFF thus the address will be 0:0:0:0:0:FFFF:0A0A:0A05.
> And represented likely in the "peers_ipv6"

I'm no really sure, but isnt ::0A0A:0A05 what you mean?

Kosta


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BitTorrent/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/