Re: UPnP, NATs, and P2P
Yejun Yang <[email protected]> Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:06:02 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.bit-torrent.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Even without UPnP, penetrating NAT is still possible. Currently MS Torendo IPv6 server protocal can let 2 peers both behind NAT to communicate with each other directly without server relay. On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 05:24:08 -0500, Bill Cox <[email protected]> wrote: > > >From what I can tell, enabling UPnP on NAT enabled gateway is not > currently a good idea. There are too many computers with spy-ware and > worse, and allowing those applications to open ports through your fire- > wall is risky. > > The problem this causes is that P2P enabled applications like BitTorrent > aren't able to contact peers behind NATs unless the users are computer- > savvy enough to forward a BitTorrent port. > > Is this a long-term problem, or is there some solution out there? IPv6 > wont do it: we don't use NATs just to save IP address space, we use NATs > for security. > > Bill > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BitTorrent/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/