Re: Cacti created rrd files - have I understood correctly?
James Bensley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.cacti.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAWx_pVCiTbYPg_e7p269km8e3OXm=RFbaqDFFzxXGJi2twr5w@mail.gmail.com> |
Oh! I pasted the info from the wrong rrd file :) That was not in the default style of Cacti, the output below is from a default style Cacti created rrd file. So it looks like we have two data sources for a router interface, trafifc_in and traffic_out. We then have four consolidate functions. Comparing this rrdtool output to that in my last email, assuming I have understood the various tutorials and guides correctly, it is these four consolidate functions defined here that are removing data accuracy over time, yes; We have two streams, AVERAGE and MAX and four stages of resolution (four sets of consolidate parameters for both MAX and AVERAGE). Is that correct? In my previous email, that graph should never loose accuracy, correct? Because the consolidate function has pdp_per_row =1 and no cdp configuration? Many thanks as always, James. root@server:/var/lib/cacti/rra# rrdtool info lalala.rrd filename = "lalala" rrd_version = "0003" step = 300 last_update = 1372952702 ds[traffic_out].type = "COUNTER" ds[traffic_out].minimal_heartbeat = 600 ds[traffic_out].min = 0.0000000000e+00 ds[traffic_out].max = 1.0000000000e+09 ds[traffic_out].last_ds = "1437943606" ds[traffic_out].value = 5.1824832215e+03 ds[traffic_out].unknown_sec = 0 ds[traffic_in].type = "COUNTER" ds[traffic_in].minimal_heartbeat = 600 ds[traffic_in].min = 0.0000000000e+00 ds[traffic_in].max = 1.0000000000e+09 ds[traffic_in].last_ds = "2703612970" ds[traffic_in].value = 6.6731006711e+03 ds[traffic_in].unknown_sec = 0 rra[0].cf = "AVERAGE" rra[0].rows = 600 rra[0].pdp_per_row = 1 rra[0].xff = 5.0000000000e-01 rra[0].cdp_prep[0].value = NaN rra[0].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0 rra[0].cdp_prep[1].value = NaN rra[0].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0 rra[1].cf = "AVERAGE" rra[1].rows = 700 rra[1].pdp_per_row = 6 rra[1].xff = 5.0000000000e-01 rra[1].cdp_prep[0].value = 1.5153367923e+04 rra[1].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0 rra[1].cdp_prep[1].value = 1.0064346431e+04 rra[1].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0 rra[2].cf = "AVERAGE" rra[2].rows = 775 rra[2].pdp_per_row = 24 rra[2].xff = 5.0000000000e-01 rra[2].cdp_prep[0].value = 6.1901419972e+04 rra[2].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0 rra[2].cdp_prep[1].value = 7.0289048628e+04 rra[2].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0 rra[3].cf = "AVERAGE" rra[3].rows = 797 rra[3].pdp_per_row = 288 rra[3].xff = 5.0000000000e-01 rra[3].cdp_prep[0].value = 4.9867273042e+05 rra[3].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0 rra[3].cdp_prep[1].value = 6.3343303006e+05 rra[3].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0 rra[4].cf = "MAX" rra[4].rows = 600 rra[4].pdp_per_row = 1 rra[4].xff = 5.0000000000e-01 rra[4].cdp_prep[0].value = NaN rra[4].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0 rra[4].cdp_prep[1].value = NaN rra[4].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0 rra[5].cf = "MAX" rra[5].rows = 700 rra[5].pdp_per_row = 6 rra[5].xff = 5.0000000000e-01 rra[5].cdp_prep[0].value = 9.8909800000e+03 rra[5].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0 rra[5].cdp_prep[1].value = 3.3895041333e+03 rra[5].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0 rra[6].cf = "MAX" rra[6].rows = 775 rra[6].pdp_per_row = 24 rra[6].xff = 5.0000000000e-01 rra[6].cdp_prep[0].value = 9.8909800000e+03 rra[6].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0 rra[6].cdp_prep[1].value = 3.4896453545e+03 rra[6].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0 rra[7].cf = "MAX" rra[7].rows = 797 rra[7].pdp_per_row = 288 rra[7].xff = 5.0000000000e-01 rra[7].cdp_prep[0].value = 9.8909800000e+03 rra[7].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0 rra[7].cdp_prep[1].value = 3.4976059667e+03 rra[7].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev