Re: Questions about interface traffic statistics

Stephan Seitz <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:16:17 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.network.cacti.user
Organization Minas Tirith, Gondor
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 01:36:48PM -0500, Tom Bilan wrote:
>You need to use the 64 bit counter.  The number of bits you're transferring
>is exceeding the capacity of the 32 bit counter and it's rolling over
>before your 5 minute poll.

Thanks for the hint. I changed everything to 64bit counter and added the 
total bandwidth options. The Netapp filer were a little bit difficult 
because they use their own 64bit OIDs, so I had to expand the 
interface.xml file.

But all linux bonding devices are still completly wrong, now even more 
than before. I deleted and recreated one, but no changes. I don’t 
understand why. The ifconfig values are looking good.

Cisco port-channels are working fine as well.

Is anyone using cacti with linux bonding devices?

Shade and sweet water!

	Stephan

-- 
| Stephan Seitz          E-Mail: [email protected] |
| Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/keys.html |

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. 
Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization and the
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

_______________________________________________
cacti-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cacti-user
smime.p7s (application/x-pkcs7-signature, 3.6 KB) - not displayed