Re: Questions about interface traffic statistics
Stephan Seitz <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:16:17 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.cacti.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | Minas Tirith, Gondor |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 01:36:48PM -0500, Tom Bilan wrote: >You need to use the 64 bit counter. The number of bits you're transferring >is exceeding the capacity of the 32 bit counter and it's rolling over >before your 5 minute poll. Thanks for the hint. I changed everything to 64bit counter and added the total bandwidth options. The Netapp filer were a little bit difficult because they use their own 64bit OIDs, so I had to expand the interface.xml file. But all linux bonding devices are still completly wrong, now even more than before. I deleted and recreated one, but no changes. I don’t understand why. The ifconfig values are looking good. Cisco port-channels are working fine as well. Is anyone using cacti with linux bonding devices? Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- | Stephan Seitz E-Mail: [email protected] | | Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/keys.html | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ cacti-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cacti-user
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 3.6 KB) - not displayed