GCEMS graphs not showing correctly
Igor Potjevlesch <[email protected]> Fri, 16 Jan 2015 17:43:56 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.cacti.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJmJ=jERrjK-Z=HDG4LC+rGC=Om3yHBxoiGV-nym3YH8mequsw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hello,
I have updated Cacti from version 0.8.7b to 0.8.8b a while ago with RRDTool
1.3.8 in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 environment. When I did the update I
loaded the old cacti.sql database from my older version and everything
looked fine except for the GCEMS graphs. The big problem is that the MAX,
AVERAGE and CURRENT values for the GCEMS graph are not as they should be, a
value that should be of 230 is a 2 and so on.
I tried to go back to the old version to see if there was that kind of
issue but the graphs are still not as they should be.
The graph template configuration of the GCEMS 7 sources graphs is:
*Graph Item Graph Item Type CF Type Item # 1 AREA
AVERAGE Item # 2 GPRINT MAX Item # 3
GPRINT AVERAGE Item # 4 GPRINT
LAST Item # 5 STACK AVERAGE Item # 6
GPRINT MAX Item # 7 GPRINT
AVERAGE Item # 8 GPRINT LAST Item # 9
STACK AVERAGE Item # 10 GPRINT
MAX Item # 11 GPRINT AVERAGE Item # 12 GPRINT
LASTItem # 13 STACK AVERAGE Item #
14 GPRINT MAX Item # 15 GPRINT
AVERAGE Item # 16 GPRINT LAST Item # 17
STACK AVERAGE Item # 18 GPRINT
MAX Item # 19 GPRINT AVERAGE Item # 20 GPRINT
LAST Item # 21 STACK AVERAGE Item
# 22 GPRINT MAX Item # 23 GPRINT
AVERAGE Item # 24 GPRINT LAST Item # 25
LINE2 AVERAGE Item # 26 GPRINT
MAX Item # 27 GPRINT AVERAGE Item # 28 GPRINT
LAST*
The .rrd files are well generated each minute but cacti makes a wrong
interpretaion of the data.
In order to clear your mind this is how the picture should look like:
[image: Images intégrées 1]
And this is how it actually looks:
[image: Images intégrées 2]
Thank you in advance.
Regards,
Igor
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
cacti-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cacti-user