Re: CICQ: Authorisation now required?!
Petr Pisar <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.centericq |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Almighty Pegasus Epsilon wrote: >> Some clients may ignore (if the users want it that way) users that are >> not on their list. The only way to get around that is to send a request >> authorisation afaik. And it is best to do that automagically everytime >> since you probably wouldn't do it manually. > > personally, i would rather have a non-authorization-asking add, and a > method of asking outside the add... > I agree too. Let's say the added contact is a radio station or something similar. It'll be very anonying for radio stuff to be asked all the time for authorisation. (Maybe it's a problem of the remote client to be able to ack authorisation automatically.) - -- Petr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE/R29uR4f4nEwzHIRAsMbAJwKZz9GpwgE6Ceg82GzJKQ8SofiKACeOR+h c25dNtLx3GF34dVyp04nl/Q= =79gJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Cicq mailing list Cicq-xGejAJT2w6wWP6gT/[email protected] http://mailman.linuxpl.org/mailman/listinfo/cicq Questions? Check the FAQ first: http://centericq.de/faq/