Re: CVS access or Project Progress

On 16/02/07, Marc H. Thoben <[email protected]> wrote:
> Tiger!P wrote:
> > Although it is true that what really matters is that it works, but a
> > good name is not something you should try to find later. I would like it
> > that the name would stay the same. Since a lot of people already know
> > centericq and what it does.
>
> True, but a lot of people also know, that there has been almost no
> development in centericq for quite a long time. So a new name like
> centerim could bring them back and get rid of the "dead-software"
> perception.

I am quite sure that Konst won't have any objection if we use the same name.
On the other hand, to get rid of the "dead-software" perception a new
release number  (i.e. 3.0) should suffice...
_______________________________________________
Cicq mailing list
Cicq-xGejAJT2w6wWP6gT/[email protected]
http://mailman.linuxpl.org/mailman/listinfo/cicq
Questions? Check the FAQ first: http://centericq.de/faq/