Re: Server downtime

Frank Altpeter wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> on 2007-03-19 at 15:41:46 CET, Iulian Ciorascu wrote:
>   
>>> There was a problem with my server. It's up again, but yet i don't know
>>> what caused the downtime. Due to a failure in the monitoring service i
>>> didn't get a notification about that...
>>>   
>>>       
>> They will have to install a super-monitoring service that monitors the
>> monitoring service. This way you'll get a notification when the
>> monitoring service doesn't monitor anymore.
>>     
>
> Sure, and a monitoring that monitors the monitoring of the monitoring...
>   
Amen :).
>> My opinion is that we move too fast without a real base. I've been quiet
>> till now, I was the second person with CVS write access. We have things
>> that work. Changing them with things that might be nicer but have
>> downtime from time to time might not be a good solution at the moment.
>> I'm not saying that we shouldn't do this and that, just that we
>> shouldn't hurry up.
>>     
>
> I understand that you might have objections in moving to my server, but
> this downtime was of course according to murphy's law exactly only few
> days after the move, but it's nothing that happens "from time to time".
>
> I'm happy to give my server and my time to the project, but judging that
> fast because of a little downtime is a bit hard :-)
>   
What I meant was not pointed only to the site change but to the great
number of changes that happened lately . It was just an example. :) I
don't have any objections in doing anything, I am just worried that
there are too many changes in too little time, that's all :). That's not
the CenterICQ I know where nothing happens :)).

Regards,
Iulian


_______________________________________________
Cicq mailing list
Cicq-xGejAJT2w6wWP6gT/[email protected]
http://mailman.linuxpl.org/mailman/listinfo/cicq
Questions? Check the FAQ first: http://centericq.de/faq/