R: R: Cricket Performance
"Angelo Deflorio" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.cricket.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAGa7CIkY1WBKjNbUiOIOpBgBADeVolXk9FNKr/[email protected]> |
All my servers was connected to 100Mb hub, each collector ethernet used constantly about 100-200 kb/s inbound, don't remember exactly, sure below 500 kb/s, never had network congestion. I've never had file locking problems. Remember to compile your configuration on your nfs host only, could be necessary to modify collector script in order to block automatic recompile on configuration changes. I used this configuration until some years ago and it worked fine. bye angelo -----Messaggio originale----- Da: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Per conto di Marc Powell Inviato: giovedì 8 giugno 2006 22.09 A: [email protected] Oggetto: Re: [cricket-users] R: Cricket Performance > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:cricket-users- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Angelo Deflorio > Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 2:57 PM > To: 'Levin, Craig A.'; [email protected] > Subject: [cricket-users] R: Cricket Performance > > I've been monitoring about 600 routers some years ago, having non so much > CPU power on my cricket servers. > Having so much target to collect you have to use multple collectors, with > high CPU usage and cricket web interface slow down. > > My solution was to split the two basic cricket functions (collector and > grapher) and to spread the collector function across a pool of servers. > In this case I used: > - one front end Linux server (RH70), apache equipped, hosting the cricket > configuration and cricket data exported via nfs, used to browse collected > data. > - three back end Linux servers (RH70), linking the same front end nfs for > config.db and rrd database, each one collecting its portion of data (about > 200 devices) all the time. I have the same kind of configuration but without NFS. I have 5 data collectors each collecting stats on about 1000 devices each that I periodically rsync config and data information between a central host. I am definitely planning on moving to the NFS model and was concerned that there might be file-locking issues, etc. Glad to hear that it worked out for you. Do you happen to track bandwidth utilization between your collectors and the central NFS host? Thanks, -- Marc _______________________________________________ cricket-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cricket-users