Re: Getting failover: link startup timeout

--===============2456597483054900896==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000083a22b05ff8f3654"

--00000000000083a22b05ff8f3654
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Bob, Sorry I didn't get you, The ports are not duplicated in the second
case

Case 1)Failover-peer1 (Server A and Server B)--port 647
      and Failover-peer-2(Server B and Server A) --> port 648

Case 2) Failover-peer1 (ServerA --primary port 647 and Server
B--failover-port 648)
    and Failover-peer-2(Server B --primary port 649 and Server A-->failover
port 650)

In the second case, we don't have duplicate ports, and to your earlier
statement

I tried both cases and both have issues

First, your config isn't correct. You have both the primary and secondary
configured with the same IP address

---> Is using the same server as primary and failover a wrong thing in ISC?

Thanks


On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 6:27=E2=80=AFPM Bob McDonald <[email protected]>=
 wrote:

> Upon re-reading my post, I have responded incorrectly. Instead of
> duplicating the IP address of the two servers, I meant to point out that
> the port was duplicated.
>
> Mea culpa,
>
> Bob
>

--00000000000083a22b05ff8f3654
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi Bob, Sorry I didn&#39;t get you, The ports are not dupl=
icated=C2=A0in the second case=C2=A0<div><br><div>Case 1)Failover-peer1 (Se=
rver A and Server B)--port 647</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 and Failover-=
peer-2(Server B and Server A) --&gt; port 648</div><div><br></div><div>Case=
 2) Failover-peer1 (ServerA --primary port 647 and Server B--failover-port =
648)</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 and Failover-peer-2(Server B --primary port 64=
9 and Server A--&gt;failover port 650)</div><div><br></div><div>In the seco=
nd case, we don&#39;t have duplicate ports, and to your earlier statement=
=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>I tried both cases and both have issues=C2=
=A0</div><div><pre style=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0)">First, your config isn&#39;t =
correct. You have both the primary and secondary
configured with the same IP address
</pre><pre style=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span style=3D"font-family:Arial,Helv=
etica,sans-serif">---&gt; Is using the same server as primary and failover =
a wrong thing in ISC?</span><span style=3D"color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:=
Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">=C2=A0</span>

</pre><pre style=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0)">Thanks</pre></div></div></div><br><di=
v class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Sat, Jul 1=
, 2023 at 6:27=E2=80=AFPM Bob McDonald &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bmcdonaldjr@gm=
ail.com">[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D=
"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(2=
04,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">Upon re-reading my post, I h=
ave responded=C2=A0incorrectly. Instead of duplicating the IP address of th=
e two servers, I meant to point out that the port was duplicated.<div><br><=
/div><div>Mea culpa,</div><div><br></div><div>Bob</div></div>
</blockquote></div>

--00000000000083a22b05ff8f3654--

--===============2456597483054900896==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

-- 
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.

dhcp-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users

--===============2456597483054900896==--