Re: Ubuntu update to isc-dhcp-server seems to have broken config file processing

Glenn Satchell <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.dhcp.isc.dhcp-server
Message-ID <6c64f36af06129bf6515512eaeccfbd0__41916.6093271755$1630751396$gmane$org@uniq.com.au>
They seem to have fixed that bug on Launchpad 
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930917), so good news for those that 
like to use the absolute latest releases :)

This bug was fixed in the package isc-dhcp - 4.4.1-2.2ubuntu8

---------------
isc-dhcp (4.4.1-2.2ubuntu8) impish; urgency=medium
   * Fix regression caused by rebuild with newer toolchain (LP: #1930917)
     - debian/rules: build with -fno-strict-aliasing.

regards,
Glenn

On 2021-06-07 23:52, bls s wrote:
> Response from Ubuntu on Launchpad 
> (https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930917):
> 
> I can confirm the update introduced a regression on Hirsute (and
> Impish I presume). Focal and Groovy work properly. Unfortunately, it's
> not related to the security patch, but it stems from the package being
> rebuilt with the newer toolchain in Hirsute, so removing the patch
> won't fix the issue.
> 
> I am currently investigating how to fix this.
> 
> ** Also affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Hirsute)
>    Importance: Undecided
>        Status: New
> 
> ** Also affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Impish)
>    Importance: Undecided
>        Status: Confirmed
> 
> ** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Hirsute)
>        Status: New => Confirmed
> 
> ** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Hirsute)
>      Assignee: (unassigned) => Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
> 
> ** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Impish)
>      Assignee: (unassigned) => Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
> 
> ** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Hirsute)
>    Importance: Undecided => Critical
> 
> ** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Impish)
>    Importance: Undecided => Critical
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcp-users <[email protected]> On Behalf Of bls s
> Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 7:02 AM
> To: Users of ISC DHCP <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Ubuntu update to isc-dhcp-server seems to have broken
> config file processing
> 
> Thanks, Simon for confirming my understanding.
> 
> Yes, have backed off to the previous version and it works, so there's
> a workaround.
> 
> I'm off to sort out how to file an actual bug report on Ubuntu in the
> hope that they revert the change (whatever it is!).
> 
> Benn
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcp-users <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Simon 
> Hobson
> Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 5:03 AM
> To: Users of ISC DHCP <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Ubuntu update to isc-dhcp-server seems to have broken
> config file processing
> 
> bls s <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> I'm using isc-dhcp-server 4.4.1-2 on RasPiOS Buster, and it's working 
>> fine with the following subnet declaration:
>> 
>> subnet 192.168.92.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>>     option domain-search "foo.com", "dyn.foo.com";
>>     option broadcast-address 192.168.92.255;
>>     allow duplicates;
>>     ddns-updates off;
>>     pool {
>>         ddns-updates on;
>>         allow unknown-clients;
>>         option domain-name "dyn.foo.com";
>>         ddns-rev-domainname "dhcp";
>>         default-lease-time 86400;
>>         max-lease-time 86400;
>>         range 192.168.92.101 192.168.92.127;
>>     }
>> }
> 
> That looks fine
> 
>> This same subnet config worked on Ubuntu 21.04 a couple of weeks ago, 
>> with isc-dhcp-server V4.4.1-2.2-ubuntu6 on it. Today I updated on 
>> Ubuntu, got isc-dhcp-server V4.4.1-2.2ubuntu6.1 and now 
>> isc-dhcp-server complains about "Can't clone pool group".
>> 
>> I found that I can put the pool declaration outside of the subnet 
>> declaration on Ubuntu, and it works correctly. Unfortunately, doing 
>> this on RasPiOS fails!
> 
> Having a pool outside of a subnet isn't a valid config. It may appear
> to work, as do some other config errors, but may cause some really
> "interesting" issues.
> 
>> Am I totally using subnet and pool incorrectly, or is this an 
>> incompatible change in isc-dhcp-server? And, is it an intended change 
>> coming to mainline isc-dhcp-server or did Ubuntu bork it?
> 
> I'd be thinking that there's something changed in the Ubuntu version.
> Can you roll-back to the earlier version and try it again ?
> 
> Simon
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
> subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
> information.
> 
> dhcp-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
> _______________________________________________
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
> subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
> information.
> 
> dhcp-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
> _______________________________________________
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
> subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
> information.
> 
> dhcp-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
_______________________________________________
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.

dhcp-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.