Re: Question
Leslie Rhorer <[email protected]> Fri, 3 Jun 2022 08:23:31 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.dhcp.isc.dhcp-server |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <a2503d6a-4961-78a6-733c-fd7e4593ce8a__523.831059557267$1654262653$gmane$org@siliconventures.net> |
On 6/3/2022 5:03 AM, Glenn Satchell wrote: > ok, now we are getting somewhere... > > Note startup error messages should be in syslog, or perhaps "systemctl > status isc-dhcp-server" will show them. I have it logging to /var/log/dhcp/dhcp.log with logrotate enabled for the directory, but that doesn't really matter. > > So having the "wrong" network range would cause issues, the requests > come in from a certain subnet, and the server tries to match the > requests to a subnet definition, but of course on the secondary server > it doesn't have 192.168.0.0 so it can't offer an address. That > explains why there is no requests being served. I think maybe you lost me. Both are on the same /23 subnet, just in one case not where I wanted them. Both 192.168.0.200 - 240 and 192.168.1.220 - 240 are on 192.168.0/23. > > Next in the failover peer section, both config files have "primary". > One of them needs to be "secondary" How the heck did that happen? I could swear one was set to "secondary". > , eg changing backup to be the back up server should have this as the > failover peer setting. mclt is only specified on primary. This would > definitely be causing problems now as you have top primary failover > peers for the same subnet. Before there were two different subnets, so > no clashes as failover is done on a subnet by subnet basis. You could > have different peers for each subnet for example. Hmm, OK, maybe I follow. > With this change I think it should work now... fingers crossed :) > Yeah. What you said. -- ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. dhcp-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users