Re: Red Hat Directory Server
Manuel Amador <[email protected]> Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:02:37 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.directoryadmin |
|---|---|
| Organization | Amauta |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
El vie, 03-06-2005 a las 16:49 -0400, [email protected] escribió: > > The new Fedora Directory Server, aka former Netscape DS works just fine with > > DS; it does not have the anal restrictions like OpenLDAP recent versions have > > about enforcing structural integrity and not allowing it to be disabled. > > You view this as a postive thing!? > > I've looked at NDS/FDS and it shows serious signs of code-rot IMHO; > OpenLDAP has ZOOMED past where this product was when its parent abandoned > developing it. ehahem, 1. the restrictions on structural integrity are due to an anal interpretation of the RFCs, as far as I know. Other directory servers simply don't have those restrictions. All I can say is that many, many nice things which would be possible under the common interpretation of the standard, are simply outlawed by OpenLDAP. 2. NDS always has had very mature administration tools, whereas with OpenLDAP you're practically stuck with the ldap command-line tools. That is simply unacceptable in a corporate environment. -- Manuel Amador <[email protected]> Amauta