Re: Object Class Violation

Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) wrote:
> I think it would be much better to just support samba 3 since samba 3 is
> widely deployed and distributed now.  There's no point in catering to
> samba 2 users now.
> 
> Someone I think either provided patches or branched DA for that exactly.
> Can't remember.


It's in the 1.7 svn branch, and there are even beta rpms available. We 
didn't have any activity on the list for a long time, so not much has 
been done lately.

It seems that interest is picking up again, so it's time to start doing 
something again :-)

--
mike