Re: Potentially Predatory Pre-Announcement of Possible Vaporware (zinq-djbdns-0.01)

Daryl Tester wrote:
> (* Followup set to avoid auto-responders *)
> 
> Mark Johnson wrote:
> 
>>     For now, I'm trying to keep the changes fairly minimal.  Well,
>> apart from converting to Autoconf/Automake, anyway.
> 
> Two sentences:  "Ewww! Why?"
> 
> Honestly, what's the requirement?  It compiles fine without it now,
> so this appears to be adding a dependency with little benefit.

I tend to agree.

A better project (IMO) would be to provide well-packaged RPMS.

R.