Re: Potentially Predatory Pre-Announcement of Possible Vaporware (zinq-djbdns-0.01)

>> Right.  There's a few reasonable patches worth packaging in, e.g., the
>> small bug fixes from J. deBPollard.  Beyond that, the recently
>> discussed patchlet to handle large responses seems benign and useful,
>> and at some point we'll need to think about EDNS0 and maybe even
>> DNSSEC.
>
>    I have no interest in 'packaging' patches.

In case it wasn't obvious, I meant putting together packages that are
already patched, a la netqmail 1.06.

R's,
John