Re: Potentially Predatory Pre-Announcement of Possible Vaporware (zinq-djbdns-0.01)
"Mark Johnson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.djbdns |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Brian Reichert <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 04:31:07PM -0600, Mark Johnson wrote: >> At the moment, the only things on my list (aside from >> autotoolization and errno) are a fresh list of root nameservers and >> maybe the SIGPIPE fix. Any nominations for anything else? Flames? >> Insults? > > Updated leapseconds for libtai? Before I shot zinq-djbdns-0.01 up to SourceForge today, I took a look at the libtai bits that I imported from djbdns-1.05. I didn't see any references to leapseconds. It seems that the separately published libtai-0.60 is a superset of what comes with djbdns-1.05? One of my goals is to get daemontools/ucspi-tcp/djbdns using the same static libraries. I'm not ready to tackle that at the moment though. Can anybody offer any insight as to the differences between the libtai bits in djbdns and libtai-0.60? Anybody have an updated lepseconds table that includes the one that went in around the start of the year?