Re: Header bug?

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]> wrote:
> Even with the extern "C" bits, the header declaration must still match the
> code (just to note).  And yes, C++ compatible headers would be quite useful.
> ;)
>
> --Quanah

C++ compatible headers aren't even on my priority list for
zinq-djbdns, but I am trying to clean up the K&R cruft and get rid of
compiler warnings.  If I change the declaration and definition of
byte_zero to be:

extern void byte_zero(char *, unsigned int);

Is that going to break anything for anybody? Did djb maybe code as he
did so he could request register storage for n?