Re: djbdns/dnscache poisoning weakness
Michael Sierchio <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.djbdns |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dean Anderson wrote: > Actually, it turns out that Dan Kaminsky wrote a fast TCP scanner that > bypassed the unix TCP stack. TCP can scale. Just not with the file > descriptor abstraction. I don't think a distributed DATABASE of the scale of the DNS system can operate using TCP, independent of any implementation optimization. Even if the computation overhead of the protocol elements were reduced by a decimal order of magnitude, latency as a percentage of bandwidth continues to grow. This doesn't favor a connection oriented protocol with a 3-way handshake. RFC 1644-style T/TCP might be interesting, but has largely been abandoned for its own set of security problems. I think DJB's proposed solution is the only workable approach.