Re: djbdns/dnscache poisoning weakness

Michael Sierchio <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.djbdns
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dean Anderson wrote:

> Actually, it turns out that Dan Kaminsky wrote a fast TCP scanner that 
> bypassed the unix TCP stack.  TCP can scale. Just not with the file 
> descriptor abstraction.

I don't think a distributed DATABASE of the scale of the DNS system
can operate using TCP, independent of any implementation optimization.
Even if the computation overhead of the protocol elements were reduced
by a decimal order of magnitude, latency as a percentage of bandwidth
continues to grow.  This doesn't favor a connection oriented protocol
with a 3-way handshake.  RFC 1644-style T/TCP might be interesting,
but has largely been abandoned for its own set of security problems.

I think DJB's proposed solution is the only workable approach.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.