Re: 2 forwarded messages...DNSEXT discussion of Day and Kaminsky
[email protected] (Paul Jarc)
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.djbdns |
|---|---|
| Organization | What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid? |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > - If one agrees that reducing the number of ports consumed might affect > the entropy of the port number You keep saying this, but you never explain it. I'm trying to figure out what you mean, but I haven't had any success so far. Analogies with popcorn poppers aren't very illuminating. Please provide complete, technical detail. The change suggested by Kevin Day, and implemented by Jeff King, and having nothing whatsoever to do with Dan Kaminsky as far as I can tell, does not reuse the same port for multiple outgoing queries. It only causes fewer outgoing queries to be sent while dnscache is under a birthday attack. When it isn't under such an attack, the behavior is unchanged. And in any case, when outgoing queries are sent, the port numbers are chosen the same way as before. What's the problem? paul