Re: 2 forwarded messages...DNSEXT discussion of Day and Kaminsky
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.djbdns |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Dean Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I do know that qmerge doesn't make THAT change. My example was to > demonstrate that changes affect the attacks that are possible. That's a straw man. No one suggested that changes never affect attack success probabilities. What I said, and continue to stand by, is that for any forgery attack against djbdns 1.05 patched with Kevin Day's qmerge patch, there exists another forgery attack against stock djbdns 1.05 with comparable or better chance of success. You refute this statement, but have so far failed to give any arguments discrediting it. Instead you wave your arms about ridiculous changes like disabling dnscache's random number generator.