Re: merge-similar-outgoing-queries.patch and lame servers

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:21:25AM -0500, Mark Johnson wrote:

> > Sorry, nothing yet; I have been busy with other work. I'll try to get to
> > it soon.
> 
> Any reason not to apply your incremental patches in the meantime?

They are not very well tested at this point. But assuming they are not
introducing new bugs, they should be an improvement over the original
qmerge patch.

I think you want:

  http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.djbdns/13863
  http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.djbdns/13867

but _not_:

  http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.djbdns/13868

My plan is to start fresh and try to do the merging below the
dns_transmit level.

-Peff