Re: merge-similar-outgoing-queries.patch and lame servers
Mark Johnson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.djbdns |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Jeff King <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:21:25AM -0500, Mark Johnson wrote: > >> > Sorry, nothing yet; I have been busy with other work. I'll try to get to >> > it soon. >> >> Any reason not to apply your incremental patches in the meantime? > > They are not very well tested at this point. But assuming they are not > introducing new bugs, they should be an improvement over the original > qmerge patch. > > I think you want: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.djbdns/13863 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.djbdns/13867 > > but _not_: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.djbdns/13868 > > My plan is to start fresh and try to do the merging below the > dns_transmit level. > > -Peff Unless you'd rather I didn't, I'll drop the first two out in zinq-djbdns-0.06 in the next day or so.