Re: [Zinq-general] Patch to open data.cdb no more than once per second

On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> wrote:
>  If you're going to patch tinydns anyway, go the whole way and give
> strong guarantees, even if it means changing the interface. I favour
> the SIGHUP patch over the one-second patch.

I'd be happy to take a look at any patches anybody would care to send
me or point me to.  I went with Lennert's one-second patch because it
had been around a while, was in use, involved minimal changes, didn't
seem to break anything, and it looked like he'd done some benchmarking
of the changes (which indicated a real benefit).

I'd really prefer to have tinydns notice that data.cdb has changed and
re-open it on it's own, but I'd take a look at any proposed SIGHUP
solutions.  I'm not going to code up anything like that on my own in
the near future, but I am looking for a better solution for the long
term.