Re: can't resolve some addresses

Alex Efros <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.djbdns
Organization http://powerman.name/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi!

On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 09:56:56PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> You are using the qmerge patch (or you are using zinq, which
> incorporates it). It would have been very useful to mention from the
> outset that you are not using stock dnscache.

By default, Gentoo use these patches:

headtail.patch
dnsroots.patch
dnstracesort.patch
1.05-errno.patch
CVE2009-0858_0001-check-response-domain-name-length.patch
CVE2008-4392_0001-dnscache-merge-similar-outgoing-queries.patch
CVE2008-4392_0002-dnscache-cache-soa-records.patch

First 4 are harmless and required to compile/use djbdns on modern linux.
Last 3 I've disabled and tried to resolve these hosts without them - this
doesn't solved issue. Because of this I've recompiled djbdns using all
these patches again to have standard (for Gentoo) package. So, yeah, I
gather these logs with these patches.

> That patch has issues with lame and failing servers. I posted some
> followup patches recently which improve the situation. Are you using the
> qmerge patch without those followup patches? If you are using zinq,
> which version are you using?

I've uploaded all these patches to http://powerman.name/tmp/dnscache/

I'll now disable 3 CVE* patches again and gather new logs without them.

-- 
			WBR, Alex.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.