Re: difference in dnscache installs
richard lucassen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.djbdns |
|---|---|
| Organization | XAQ Systems |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:24:20 +1030 Daryl Tester <[email protected]> wrote: > > The main question remains why these two instances of dnscache show > > this phenomenon while others on much smaller DSL lines do not. > > Didn't you say these two caches were busy? There's a fixed upper > limit on the number of outstanding queries (200?), and dnscache drops > the oldest query if that limit is reached. This sounds very logical. But OTOH DJB would have build this in as a variable, wouldn't he? I remember him telling that Bind was barfing at high loads (or was it qmail) To give you an impression: writing 1MB of non-filtered logs through multilog takes less than a second. But where can I find this upper limit? R. -- ___________________________________________________________________ It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak aloud and remove all doubt. +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Richard Lucassen, Utrecht | | Public key and email address: | | http://www.lucassen.org/mail-pubkey.html | +------------------------------------------------------------------+