Re: Dishonest Forks? | Was - Re: [Namedroppers-honest] Brian Smith asks: Who is Dean Anderson?
"Andrew Richards" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.djbdns |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 18:19:50 Dean Anderson wrote: > On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Kevin wrote: > > On Mar 9, 2010, at 5:49 PM, Dean Anderson wrote: ... > As usual, Day's account is completely dishonest. In fact, we engaged in > a series of on-list and off-list emails, in which I discredited Day's > "discovery" and proposed changes as enabling a birthday attack. I don't think so: People on the list at the time ended up completely bamboozled by your weird and twisting circular arguments: You didn't discredit Day or anyone else, you just confused the hell out of people. When you saw that your technical arguments didn't stand up you shifted to more personal attacks. It really does seem like you're hooked on conspiracy theories and creating FUD. I also see you've been banned from the IETF and DNSEXT lists for being offensive, http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg38293.html e.g. "Mr Anderson has repeatedly posted, before and since, on these and other IETF lists, messages that refer offensively to individuals or organizations" Maybe we can get back to talking about genuine DNS issues and leave the conspiracy theories, incomprehensible arguments and attacks on people's reputations behind. Besides insulting those who do lots of good work on djbdns and related packages it wastes everybody's time. I must stop feeding the troll... Andrew. -- ==================================================================== * Custom email solutions * Systems Administration * Networking http://www.acrconsulting.co.uk/email/qmail.html ====================================================================