Re: Quick Poll: Would you trust system software from an anonymous source?
Dean Anderson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.djbdns |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Andrew Edelstein wrote: > On 3/10/2010 4:06 PM, Dean Anderson wrote: > > Oh, I agree its hearsay for you to repeat (I'm a direct party). All > > third party reports of polls are hearsay. (That's why the judge must ask > > each juror for their vote). But this list (quite obviously) isn't a > > (sigh) And the circular logic is presented. "It's not hearsay because > I'm a direct party. It is hearsay for anyone to repeat it. But my > 'repetition' is more trustworthy than a jury foreman." That's not circular logic. Those are the rules for Hearsay testimony. You can testify to anything you witnessed, not to things you heard other people witness. I witnessed the poll. You didn't. If you repeat what I witnessed, that's hearsay. There is nothing circular about that. --Dean -- Av8 Internet Prepared to pay a premium for better service? www.av8.net faster, more reliable, better service 617 256 5494