Re: Quick Poll: Would you trust system software from an anonymous source?

Dean Anderson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.djbdns
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Andrew Edelstein wrote:

> On 3/10/2010 4:06 PM, Dean Anderson wrote:
> > Oh, I agree its hearsay for you to repeat (I'm a direct party). All
> > third party reports of polls are hearsay. (That's why the judge must ask
>  > each juror for their vote).  But this list (quite obviously)  isn't a
> 
> (sigh) And the circular logic is presented. "It's not hearsay because 
> I'm a direct party. It is hearsay for anyone to repeat it. But my 
> 'repetition' is more trustworthy than a jury foreman."

That's not circular logic. Those are the rules for Hearsay testimony.  
You can testify to anything you witnessed, not to things you heard other
people witness. I witnessed the poll.  You didn't. If you repeat what I
witnessed, that's hearsay. 

There is nothing circular about that.

		--Dean

-- 
Av8 Internet   Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net         faster, more reliable, better service
617 256 5494
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.