Re: Quick Poll: Would you trust system software from an anonymous source?

The cornell notes you cite have no bearing on anyone's ability to report
the personally witnessed results of a poll in court.  The notes are not
proof of what you assert and refute nothing I've said. You have no
explanation of your assertion whatsoever, and it would have no relevance
in anycase. Even if your assertion was true, it wouldn't change the
facts of the poll and nor change its dicussion on this list and other
lists.

The indisputable evidence and record is that my reputation for reports
or assertions of fact is that they are true, validated and often
confirmed by independent sources. Yours are not.  My report of the poll
results is not a soapbox, nor is it hearsay. At least, it is not hearsay
for me to report it.  Your dispute is frivolous.

I can not take you seriously. No one else can either.  There, I wasted 
another 2 minutes.

		--Dean

On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Chris Pugh wrote:

> On 11 March 2010 15:31, Dean Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Anyway, I pretty much wasted yesterday talking with trolls like Chris,
> 
> Simple answer to that one,.don't.  You're right about the 'troll' bit
> though,  a certian person's  bad influence is clouding my good
> judgment. I'm going to clear my head with immediate effect.
> 
> > My report of the results I received in the Poll is not hearsay. I can go to court and report
> > the Poll.
> 
> http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode28a/usc_sec_28a_04000703----000-notes.html
> 
> > But since this list isn't a forum that rejects hearsay evidence,
> 
> Neither I believe, is is supposed to be a Dean Anderson soapbox.
> While I'll happily follow any technical discussion you choose to get
> involved in, on this topic ( as I've already intimated ), I can no
> longer take you seriously.
> 
> 
> Chris.
> 
> 

-- 
Av8 Internet   Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net         faster, more reliable, better service
617 256 5494