squirting spray foam into the crack at the bottom of the BAW
David Nicol <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.djbdns |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dean Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > server. Like I said before, an IDS should detect a 26 million packet > attack before it succeeds. DJB has said something similar. > > [...] > > There is no way that the "birthday attack window" can be closed, Safety currently appears to require an Intrusion Detection System, so building an IDS into a resolver (as has been done, see http://marc.info/?l=djbdns&m=124356186626355 ) might be considered the equivalent of squirting some expanding foam into the crack at the bottom of the window in question. What additional measures? second, third, fourth opinions from other servers presumably not under the same attack, reached over VPN links. Build that into something, a network of resilient dns servers that create a mesh of secure tcp links between each other and start chatting over them when something appears amiss?