Re: posible bug in daemontools
Chris Pugh <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.djbdns |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 14 March 2010 21:52, Mark Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Jurjen Oskam <[email protected]> wrote: >> I ran into this problem some years ago, and Paul Jarc suggested a fix: >> >> http://marc.info/?l=log&m=113571910024742&w=2 >> >> Unfortunately (or perhaps, fortunately), I didn't run into the low memory >> situation again so was not able to test his proposed fix. > > Anybody see any potential downside to this change? If not, it will be > in zinq-daemontools-0.06. LICENSE ============================================================= License? License?!? LICENSE?!? You (probably) don't need no stinking LICENSE! This software (the djb-dervied bits, anyway) has been placed into the public domain. It is not copyrighted. You are free to modify the package, distribute modified versions etc. See the AUTHORS file for further details. ============================================================= Suggestions: ------------------ Youthful enthusiasm or not, you might wish to lose the somewhat glib and smart-ar*e style comment, state license information correctly, and also maybe follow Dr Nerstein's mildly put recommendations? http://cr.yp.to/distributors.html Why bite the hand that feeds you? If you are patching where you think appropriate, you might also wish to give the user the option to sequentially apply ( or not ), rather than simply embedding them in the source. Chris.