Re: posible bug in daemontools
Erwin Hoffmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.djbdns |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, --On Friday, March 19, 2010 11:19:46 +0000 Sabahattin Gucukoglu <[email protected]> wrote: > It's been a bad week, and I'm not going to make any friends. So ... (me too). > In your fanboy rant, this part needs the most attention: > > On 19 Mar 2010, at 08:34, Laurent Bercot wrote: > Sure, but existing standards fail to address a problem that slashpackage >> does address. Part of the DJB philosophy is: if the existing standards >> don't meet your technical requirements, don't follow them. Do not settle >> for mediocrity, but design the APIs you need, for a technically better >> product. And that very philosophy gave you dns_tranmit_start() over >> gethostbyname(). > > It also gave us qmail. > http://www.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/qmail-bugs.html > > Whatever you may say about his software's "Technical excellence", it is > marked by an unbelievable and frank disrespect of others, and in several > clear cases is WRONG. Demanding respect of others under such > circumstances is therefore somewhat dangerous in the presence of > flammable liquids. Any more questions? Matthias Andree is bashing against qmail and DJB since some years. He is now actively involved in the FreeBSD team (and maintaining the Fetchmail port, AFAIK). I really considered to drop FreeBSD because of this reason for my own personal use. In particular the multi-CPU is broken, the USB support is flawed .... Most of the problems Matthias mentioned here are at least partially solved in my SPAMCONTROL patch for qmail (I actually quoted him for the Sendmail enhancement; this is a nice to have - not more). Others are simply useless. I commit to that sentence: "Part of the DJB philosophy is: if the existing standards don't meet your technical requirements, don't follow them. Do not settle for mediocrity, but design the APIs you need, for a technically better product." In my own enhancements for qmail, I try to follow that. I have published some comments about the current SMTP RFCs on my SMTP Auth web page. regards. --eh. Dr. Erwin Hoffmann | FEHCom | http://www.fehcom.de/