Re: okay already
Michael Loftis <[email protected]> Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:24:09 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.djbdns |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3102499C929EDF0080FAA48D@[192.168.1.44]> |
--On Tuesday, March 23, 2010 10:10 PM +0000 Chris Pugh <[email protected]> wrote: >> My analysis has been reposted several times. There has been no credible >> dispute of the math I have posted and none by Loftis. Loftis' last >> frivolous dispute was over Kaminsky's discredited "roulette logic" >> claims. Loftis was "confused" about who wrote them. Or perhaps Loftis >> was just dissembling and lying to create confusion. > > Sigh... A straight link to the actual 'math' as calculated by the > various protagonists in this dispute, along with it's actual context, > would have done! > The math for the rapid poisoning in DJBDNS is contained in <http://www.your.org/dnscache/djbdns.pdf> -- the general attack/vulnerability is probably best documented in <http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/457875> -- that contains many references. Kaminsky's technique seems to be very well described by <http://www.unixwiz.net/techtips/iguide-kaminsky-dns-vuln.html> Dan Kaminsky's blog at doxpara.com is apparently down right now so I can't dig up/verify any links to his site but all but the (older US CERT VU# 457875) link to his site. Kaminsky, discovered a new, quicker way of running the birthday attack. <http://www.your.org/dnscache/> contains other information from Day.